Well, ok. The title should probably be “How to write a Master’s Thesis in my group“, but’s who’s counting? Below, I’ve collected some notes on tips and tricks – it’s a long doc, but I hope it’s useful.
The page is not about the content of your thesis – it’s not about the research. It’s about all of the stuff surrounding that research. How to write, what should be included, that kind of thing.
Let me know if something could be better/clearer and I will update it. If you’re currently writing a thesis, in my group, I recommend you read it once in a while.
What is a good thesis?
The point of writing a thesis is to have a written record that demonstrates (to me and the external examiner) what you’re able to do, what you have learned.
The point, in a bit more detail, is that the thesis should show how you’re able to apply all the things you’ve learned during your reading, simulations, and research in general to solve a problem – perhaps even show how you’ve generated a bit of new knowledge yourself.
But there are many aspects to this. Below, I’ve made a relatively short list that summarizes the things that characterize an excellent thesis. It might be intimidating to read the list (since you’ll be thinking “how can I do all that?”), but don’t stress out. You have six months to get everything under control – and the point of an advisor is to help you get there. Plus the point of this page is to provide a detailed guide full of friendly tips & tricks that will help you structure your work.
Also, don’t forget that the list below describes an excellent thesis. Less will also get you to graduation – but why not aim high?
You should aim to show your:
Scope & goals. Early in the thesis (e.g. in the introduction), define your research scope (what are you setting out to do, what are you not setting out to do). Present those goals clearly. They should be attainable but high. Important trick: Once you’re all done with your research, go back to the introduction and make sure scope still fits with the work you actually did 🙂
Command of the topic (that is, showing that you know how your work fits into the bigger picture): Make sure that the papers you cite have been selected not only appropriately but critically (e.g. don’t site random web page as a reference for your machine learning). And cite more than a just few papers. A good list of references contains your key papers as well as the important papers in the field (more on this below). We want you to show us that you can read scientific papers and find the relevant ones for the topic you’re studying.
Oh, and the papers should not just be relevant, they should also be the right ones: from high-quality scientific publications (journals or other refereed forums), not the scribblings of a crazy hermit with twitter handle @theconspiracyistrue. One good trick is that good papers typically have a lot of citations on Google Scholar. And do consider how your results fit into prior research and theories on the topic. That way you can show that you have a deep understanding of the research topic.
Methods and conclusions: The goal here is to demonstrate command of the relevant research methods. Specifically show
- that you use the right methods for your problem,
- and that you have a good reason to use those methods.
As I stated above, the point of a thesis is to report the research process including the methods you have used accurately and precisely. And just as importantly, you should justify the choices you have made.
Make sure that the line of reasoning behind the conclusions is clear, accurate and critical and proves. This is how we can see that you have gained a deep understanding of the topic.
Contribution to knowledge and thesis structure: You should aim for your work to meet the standards of scientific communication. What does that mean? This means that the thesis should have a reasonable structure (see below). And it should be clearly written (see below). A good way to think about the level of detail is that someone else should be able to pick up your thesis and reproduce your work.
But also know that it is not necessary for the thesis to contribute to new scientific knowledge.
Presentation and language: The appearance, presentation and language of the thesis should be impeccable. This is the easy part, which ANYONE can do. So take great care that this is in order. Make sure everything is spelled correctly and formatted nicely. Nothing signals poor work more strongly that if you couldn’t even make the effort to present stuff nicely. Even if your scientific work is Nobel-prize level, you’ll be starting out at a serious disadvantage in the mind of the external examiner (and me) if the presentation is sloppily done.
And if you’re not good at english, find a friend who can help you. And start looking early – it can be difficult to find someone last-minute.)
After reading the list
I’ll repeat the most important thing from above one more time and expand a little bit just to make sure that we all remember this fundamental part.
The point of your thesis is to report your research process.
Tell us about the methods you have used. Do that accurately and precisely. Think reproducibility when you’re writing (also when thinking about how much math & methods to include) – someone else should be able to pick up your report and redo the work.
This also means that it is crucial justify the choices you have made (why you chose method X over method Y, why made choice Z in the preparation of data) – that way we can evaluate, not just your results, but the entire process you have used to arrive at those results (so even if you did something wrong, you can still get credit for having thought about the problem the right way).
Don’t be overwhelmed by all this. Below, I’ve written about lots of tips and trick on how to make all this happen.
Also, these thesis evaluation guidelines from Finland (that I stole from to make the list above) provide the best overview I’ve ever come across of characterizes an excellent thesis. In addition, the list also what characterizes a very good, good, very satisfactory, and a satisfactory thesis. I recommend you read this document very carefully. It will help you distinguish between various levels of mastery.
[UPDATE: June 3rd, 2016. DTU also has official opinions on this. Read them here.]
How you think Science works is wrong. The video below explains how it really works. Watch it – and it will make you feel better.
There’s more on the same topic in this article.
Tools: LaTeX and BibTeX
I don’t want to dictate what tools you should use to write your thesis, but you should probably use LaTeX for writing and BibTeX for your bibliography. Why, you ask?
LaTeX: The main reason to use LaTex is that it works really well for large documents with many figures and equations. MS Word, Pages, or OpenOffice probably work great for short documents, but when you get beyond 40 pages with lots of figures, things can get shaky. Not with LaTeX. LaTeX helps you structure your work, it handles references to other parts of the thesis as well as citations in a beautiful way. And also the typesetting is professional grade. Read more here.
I learned how to use LaTeX from The not so short introduction to LaTeX, but there might be better options out there these days.
BibTeX: You also have to organize all the papers you’ve read while writing your thesis. BibTeX is how LaTeX manages references. It will seem cumbersome at first, but compared to typing in each single reference manually with the right formatting, BibTeX is easy to use. Start finding a BibTeX entry for all the papers you read (you can get them via Google Scholar) and adding them to your .bib file. You will thank me later.
Exercise: Find your own BibTeX tutorial (I can’t remember how I learned it).
On the structure of your Thesis
There are many ways to structure a thesis, but I recommend something like this
- Introduction (Explain what you’re going to do)
- Literature review (Write about what the field around your research looks like)
- Dataset (Describe your dataset(s), including literature relevant to that dataset, if any)
- Methods (Describe the tools you’ve used)
- Results (Tell us what you have found)
- Discussion (Comment on your results, explain what those results mean, interpret the results in a wider context. Also indicate which results were expected or unexpected, and provide an explanation for the unexpected results)
- Conclusion (Summarize your findings, bring in perspectives)
Sometimes it makes sense to mix the Methods and Results. For example if you try out a lot of different methods, it can make sense to explain method 1 and the results found using method 1, then explain method 2 and so on.
It also sometimes makes combine the discussion and conclusion – there are many ways to mix and match. But the list above is a good starting point. If you want to read more about structuring your report, I think this page is pretty good.
For the rest of your life, no-one will care about the things you’ve tried that didn’t work. They will just want you to write down the parts that work and forget about everything else.
That’s not the case for your Master’s thesis.
The point of the thesis is to spend 6 months researching a topic, getting to know the literature, attacking the issue from different angles, and figuring out something for yourself. See “What is a good thesis” above for more details.
Your thesis should clean the research process up a little bit (as explained elsewhere in this post), but for the Master’s project, we truly want to know about all the things you’ve tried and learned. That means that negative results (e.g. something doesn’t work) are just as important as new findings. Why? Because the process (and not the result) is the important thing.
All of that means that taking notes is crucial! Let me say that again: Taking notes is super important. Writing a thesis takes six months, and there’s no way that you will be able to remember the details of the methods you used in month one, when you get around to writing the thesis.
I’m not saying you should write detailed text about your results (since you won’t know what’s important in the beginning), just note down the important findings, parameter settings, that kind of thing. Below are some examples.
- Example 1: Take notes for every paper you need, and add them to the Literature Review section in your .tex document (and add the according entry to your .bib file).
- Example 2: Save the most important figures (including plot titles and nicely labeled axes) and write a few words of caption for each one to help you remember the important results. Perhaps even add them to the appropriate section in your LaTeX file!
- Example 3: You can usually write large parts of the methods section early, why not do that? Maybe even as you’re reading up on theory?
- Example 4: Make sure your code is marginally readable because you will probably have to redo some of your calculations/simulations/predictions/analyses.
On the structure of Academic Writing
Unless you’re a great writer (in which case you don’t have to follow any rules), the structure of academic text is the following:
- First you tell your readers what you’re about to tell them.
- Then you tell the readers the thing you want to tell them.
- Finally you tell them what you’ve just told them.
This structure works on a number of levels in a thesis.
On the level of the entire thesis, the introduction tells the reader what’s going to happen in the text and the conclusion summarizes what just happened, while the chapters in between contain the actual work.
But for each chapter, you should also put an introduction and conclusion around the content, and similarly for each section. Even within each subsection, it might be good idea to start with a introductory sentence or two (setting the stage) and wrapping up. You have to stop before it gets too pedantic, but I hope the point gets across. It’s not exactly fractal, but almost.
On the tone of academic writing
You should aim for clarity when you’re writing, and make sure you keep the tone more formal than I do in this blog post. Use “do not” instead of “don’t”, “we are” instead of “we’re” and so one. Take a look at examples of other scientific writing (papers) to get a sense of the right tone.
How to create your list of references (and do the literature review)
Almost all M.Sc. theses will rely heavily on one, two, or three central papers. That’s how it (usually) works. But you need to have a much bigger list of references to show that you’re aware of the research-world surrounding those papers. I’d say somewhere between 20 and 50 is a good number. If you can find more than 50 good references, you’ll really impress the external examiner.
Which papers are important? When you’re trying to figure out which papers are the central ones, a good trick is to look at their citation count (for example in Google Scholar). Highly cited papers are usually important in their field. You can also look at the authors. Authors of good papers are usually good scientists with lots of good papers.
Expanding the list of relevant papers. Your can expand the world of your 1-3 central papersby looking at the papers that those central papers are citing. The cited papers contain the work that inspired those, so that’s probably going to be interesting to your research. And you can expand further by looking at the papers that your new set of papers are citing and so on.
You can also expand your search by checking which papers are citing your papers. Or central papers in the field. Try a keyword search in Google Scholar.
Sometimes wikipedia articles will cite papers. It’s better to cite those papers than the wikipedia article.
And when you get to the exam
You should read this friendly how-to on taking M.Sc. Exams in my group.